Reprinted from The Jerusalem Post of September 5, 1999


By David Weinberg

For more than a decade, a group of self-styled Israeli "new historians" has been ruinously deconstructing some of this country's most cherished founding "myths," questioning the justness of Israeli actions back in 1948, even the legitimacy of Israel itself. Now, it seems, the roaring scholarly debate is seeping dangerously into our children's classrooms, draining into the halls of justice, and oozing corrosively into the corridors of major political decision-making.

Quietly passed over this summer with barely a murmur of dissent was the introduction of new history textbooks in our high schools that undermine the moral case for Zionism. The New York Times noticed; the Israeli press was apparently asleep. The textbooks suggest Israeli responsibility for the Palestinian refugee problem and raise questions about the assertion that Arab intransigence is responsible for the 50-year-long festering of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Did you know that we - the beleaguered Zionist minority in Palestine - had the military edge in the War of Independence against a dozen or more organized Arab forces? Yep. According to one of our new, ministry-sponsored history books "on nearly every front and in nearly every battle, the Jewish side had the advantage over the Arabs in terms of planning, organization, operation of equipment and also in the number of trained fighters who participated in the battle."

The subversive book then talks about Zionist expulsions of Arabs, and asks students to think about the Palestinian "nakba" (catastrophe), put themselves in Arab shoes, and consider how they would have felt about Zionism. I guess that Yitzhak Levy (NRP), the immediate past education minister, was sleeping, too. The scandalous project was completed mainly on his watch.

ENTER Justice Minister Yossi Beilin. Undoubtedly one of the smartest and most creative guys in Israeli politics, Beilin ambitiously has set out to rework his side of government in the "new historians" image. To begin with, Beilin froze legislation of the so- called "intifada law." The purpose of the law, supported by a large majority of Knesset members, is to preclude the filing of suits for compensatory damages against the state by Palestinians who were wounded during the intifada.

I guess that Beilin thought this law was simply, well, unfair to the Palestinians. Or perhaps he thinks that the intifada rock- and bomb-throwers were justified.Then Beilin announced that he was opposed in principle to distinguishing between plain old Arab security prisoners and Arab terrorists "with blood on their hands." In other words, Beilin favors the release of Arab prisoners convicted of murder as part of the peace process.

In the same breath, Beilin added that he strenuously objected to the release of Jews convicted of murdering Palestinians. I, personally, oppose both releases. But Beilin cerebrally explains that there is a difference. "Unlike Jewish murderers who acted on their own volition," he dithers, "Palestinian terrorists acted out of national interests."

Uh-huh. So if you're a card-carrying PLO member or Hamasnik, murder is more understandable. Because it is for a (legitimate?) cause. Sounds like post-Zionism to me. Moral obtuseness, too. Beilin now wants to revoke the Emergency Regulations, that permit the administrative detention of security prisoners; the Emergency Search Prerogative Law, which allows the police and army to search people in public places, like malls; and the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance, which allows the government to close the offices and seize the property of suspected terrorist groups.

The entire security establishment is opposed to the moves. But our justice minister is unperturbed. We don't need such "obsolete" security tools (Beilin's term). Not if peace is breaking out all over and anyway we won't be holding Palestinians "with blood on their hands" behind bars for long. As if this was Switzerland; as if the peace process isn't likely to be accompanied by terrorist threats, and as if there still aren't good reasons for potent Israeli counter-measures.

Beilin also has doubts about the pending "General Security Service law," a long-coming piece of legislation intended to codify the GSS's powers. Beilin is worried that the legislation gives "too much latitude and scope of responsibility" to the internal security agency. He is considering a ban on the GSS's use of "moderate physical pressure" in interrogations. Why? Because defending ourselves too toughly is not nice. They don't do it this way in Switzerland. Why should we be any different?

It's time to reign in the "distortiographers" and over-zealous human rights crusaders at the Justice and Education ministries. Otherwise, we'll all become ideologically-bereft Swiss neutrals, sheepish about our national rights in the Land of Israel and embarrassed by the ongoing, courageous effort to defend them.

(c) Jerusalem Post 1999


Editor's Note: In this morning's Houston Chronicle Consul General of Israel, Tzion Evrony gave us wonderful Peres-like fantasy view of the peace process. Unfortunately the facts support a more realistic view of Israel-Arab relations. How do I know without any doubt that I am right? Let me count the ways:

1. The PA (Palestinian Authority) has failed to destroy (or even attempt to destroy) the infrastructure of the terrorist organizations. There has been some minor security cooperation but Arafat has been careful to preserve Hamas and Islamic Jihad for future terrorist pressure on Israel.

2. The PA has not ended incitement and anti-Semitic attacks on Jews and Israel's (see story below).

3. The educational system run by the PA teaches hatred of Jews and Israelis and distorts history.

4. All maps, stationery letterheads, posters portraying Palestine show it including all the area of Israel as a part of Palestine. There are over 50 maps in the Palestinian schools, but Israel is not in any of them.

5. The PA has built dozens of tunnels from Sinai into Gaza in order to smuggle in heavy weapons and rockets forbidden by Oslo. It has also built a 50,000 man army - not a police force.

6. The Palestinian media and Moslem clerics agree on one thing: Oslo is temporary and their ultimate aim is the destruction of Israel. PA leaders in Arabic express the same sentiment. (Arafat's stages plan of 1974 is working according to schedule, with Oslo a stage toward complete liberation of Palestine)

7. All benefits of the "peace" process advance the process of creating a Palestinian state at the expense of Israel. Aside from useless words from notable prevaricators there has been NO benefit to Israel.

8. The continued Arab boycott of Israel proves that there has been no genuine reconciliation

9. Israel's water supply is already being damaged. Losing the Golan would be the final blow for Israeli agriculture. Aside from loss of water, the PA is deliberately polluting Israel's central mountain aquifer.

10. There are more but I have made my point. By the way, all of the above are violations of the original 1993 Oslo Accords. The Israelis have bought (the same rug) commitments from Arafat in five separate agreements. And anti-Semites use to complain that Jews were too clever. At least now that old canard will be put to rest.

 HOME  Maccabean  comments